Friday 22 April 2022

As in the Days of Lot (Russia’s Holy War)


The Bible, Luke 17 
22 Then he said to the disciples, “The time will come when you will wish you could see one of the days of the Son of Man, but you will not see it. 23 There will be those who will say to you, ‘Look, over there!’ or, ‘Look, over here!’ But don't go out looking for it. 24 As the lightning flashes across the sky and lights it up from one side to the other, so will the Son of Man be in his day. 25 But first he must suffer much and be rejected by the people of this day. 26 As it was in the time of Noah so shall it be in the days of the Son of Man. 27 Everybody kept on eating and drinking, and men and women married, up to the very day Noah went into the boat and the flood came and killed them all. 28 It will be as it was in the time of Lot. Everybody kept on eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building. 29 On the day Lot left Sodom, fire and sulfur rained down from heaven and killed them all. 30 That is how it will be on the day the Son of Man is revealed.

The Bible, Luke 17, foretells end times will be like the Days of Noah [Luke 17 27], and the Days of Lot [Luke 17 28].  Comparing the two examples, notice that in the Days of Noah: men and women married; while in the Days of Lot there is no mention of marriage. 

Our world today is a mixture of heterosexual and homosexual relationships: 

Heterosexual relationships 
World religions traditionally encourage and endorse marriage of a man with a woman, and this union has been recognised globally, across the millennia. 
In the recent history, heterosexual relationships without the bond of marriage have become popular and commonly accepted in many a secular countries. In fact, it’s even a recognised category in some countries, such as the term ‘common-law’ partner indicates. 

Homosexual relationships 
The Torah, The Bible, and The Quran warn against homosexual relationships, citing the example of the people of Lot who were destroyed through Divine Punishment for their crime. 

In today’s world, persons who prefer such sexual orientations, represented by LGBTQ+, and similar acronyms, are increasingly finding acceptance among the secular-minded people. It’s being promoted as a ‘human right’ and has been granted ‘constitutional rights’ in secular democracies. This change during this past half-century or so, has encouraged these people to not only live together more openly, but Gay Pride parades are held annually, in major cities, around the world, to commemorate it. [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pride_parade

Russia is an exception. After a few annual demonstrations, it has not only refused to allow the holding of Pride Parades, but has also placed a hundred-year ban. 
Recently, Russia has invaded Ukraine. The Russian Orthodox Church leader is reported to have said: 
But Patriarch Kirill said the war is about “which side of God humanity will be on” in the divide between supporters of gay pride events — or the Western governments that allow them — and their opponents in Russian-backed eastern Ukraine. 

In Pakistan, homosexuality is a punishable crime. 
However, on June 26, 2011, the US Embassy hosted the first Pride Celebration in the country. When the masses learnt about this ‘private’ event, there were demonstrations opposing it. The PPP was in power then. 
The year 2018 brought in many changes in favour of the ‘transgender’ community, and culminated in the Trans Pride Parade in Lahore in December 29, 2018. The government changed hands during the year 2018, from PML-N to PTI. 









Related posts









Last updated on: June 18, 2022 

Thursday 14 April 2022

Feminism

Throughout history, many women have been oppressed and have suffered injustices. Religion, culture, norms, have been used as excuses, throughout history, and almost all over the world. As a consequence, now that opportunity presents itself, again, they demand their rights. 

Is it correct? Or is it an inevitable evil consequence of the oppression perpetrated by society in general, and by men in particular. 

Will the feminist movement secure due rights for women, or will it liberate them from their privileged place that Allah has decreed for them in the family unit? 

Perhaps, we need to revisit history, to identify the original enemy, and then explore ways forward. 

In the first paragraph, I write ‘now that opportunity presents itself, again, they demand their rights’. The Quran, Surah an-Naml, informs us of the Queen of Saba, the ruler of a mighty nation, who had been given from everything. She had a mighty throne, and they worshipped the Sun! … when she finally sees the mighty kingdom of Allah’s servant Solomon, she realises that she had been wronging herself, and submits to the one and only deity, Allah. 

Surah an-Naml (The Ant) also mentions the Valley of Ants, and its Queen Ant, who is afraid of Solomon’s forces, and is warning her workers to take shelter while Solomon’s troops are passing through her valley, lest they are trampled upon by the marching army. 

Ant colonies are fascinating examples of meticulous organisation and the buildings they construct. They are ruled by a female ant. 

The nation of Saba is an example of high technology in the ancient world. The dam of Saba is a mighty engineering feat that finds its mention in The Quran ( Surah Saba), and its ruins testify to it. They were ruled by their Queen. 

Women have ruled in the past and do so in the present, and have been quite successful at it. Women have participated in many sciences and arts, and have held many diverse posts in many a organisations, and have proved to be no less than their male counterparts. 

The scriptures inform us that Allah created Adam especially for the Khilafat of this world, due to a special need. Through Adam, He revealed to the angels that He knows what they were hiding, and also exposed Iblis’ arrogance and enmity to Adam and his family. 

Iblis is the sworn enemy of mankind. He wants to destroy each and every one, old and young, male and female, all of us. The best way to do it is by destroying the family unit. 

Allah has placed the responsibility of the covenant, the khilafat, the establishment of justice, the containment of corruption, the financial, economic, and moral responsibility of the family unit, and the society, upon men, making them heads of their families. They work, earn the bread, rule, each one according to what Allah has bestowed upon him, and made him responsible for. Their bodies are biologically suited to consistently perform throughout their adult lives. 

Women have been given the responsibility of guarding their wombs. They are committed helpmates of their husbands. They should be loved and cherished. 

Through the wombs of women, Allah increases the progeny of Adam. Their specialised role in the family unit also makes the women vulnerable to internal and external threats. They are in danger. They need to be protected and guarded. 

Iblis is the sworn enemy of Adam and his progeny. He, and his troops (humans and jinns), exploit the weaknesses, desires, ambitions, of humans to make them harm the human family. 

Feminist movement is one such tool. Playing upon the sense of injustice and perceived inequality, he convinces many a people to change the basic roles and responsibilities, and grant women their ‘rights, and public role in society’. Women playing a more active public role requires abandoning or reducing many traditional roles, such as the number of pregnancies, and the children they raise. This directly harms the family of Adam, by limiting the number of descendants of Adam. Allah has promised to provide for each and every creation. According to estimates, there is enough in this world to feed current and projected population for the next fifty years. There is no need to depopulate humans. We must grant each potential person a right to be realised, and to live its life. Life is sacrosanct! 

Moreover, though there do exist few examples of women who have successfully lived their private and public roles, there are many examples of women finding themselves adversely affected by the ‘liberties’ granted to them. Some have to earn the bread, and take care of the home; some have to choose between family and career; some have to compromise moral principles; and some are simply exposed and unprotected from all the dangers. 

Humans can put in place all the laws to protect women, all the organisations to uphold their rights, yet they remain vulnerable to the dangers they are exposed to in the public  domain. 

On the contrary, many women who remain in the private domain of their homes find themselves deprived of their rights by their own family members. Some suffer financially, others emotionally. 

Which is better: suffering the injustices at home, or exposing yourself to the dangers pervading society? 

Our Deen ( Laws of Recompense in the hereafter) requires no change in the creation of Allah (Q30:30). The family unit is a creation of Allah. He has appointed roles and responsibilities for men and women. He has informed us that some of us are our enemies, and has promised great rewards for those who endure with patience. 

Do we choose living in the shelter of our families, with our wings clipped; or do we choose ‘liberty’ and fly away? 

Is the success of this temporary world our objective, or the eternal success of the hereafter? 

Do we choose to please Allah, or do we choose to please our nafs? 


————————————————— 

Addressing some of the Feedback received 

MY wrote on April 14, 2022: If all women were meant to stay at home and give birth, infertility wouldn't exist. 

This just sounds like hiding behind religion to excuse laziness.

Reply on April 17, 2022: I’m trying to address the macro view of the Feminist movement and it’s evil consequences for the human family. It’s about the danger we are in, and what’s measures need to be taken to protect the human family, lest we suffer. 

It’s not simply about increasing the population. Many ancient non-Muslim nations were very numerous, yet not one of them exists today. In the present world, India and China are examples of densely populated predominantly non-Muslim nations. On the contrary, the Western countries who pursued secular ideals, are facing the irreversible crisis of an ageing population, and very few young people. They expect to become minorities in their own countries in the near future. 

Abraham was childless till old age. Yet, Allah not only granted him Ishmael and Isaac, but made their progeny flourish. The Middle East is densely populated by many people who can trace their ancestry to Abraham. 

————

SY wrote on April 14, 2022: i think the argument is too dichotomous. Its either go out and work or stay at home and build family/take care of home. In the real world there is a lot of grey area, especially if you look at the diaspora of women affected by broken homes, abandonment etc. We have examples among our own relatives of women who are widowed or divorced who have to live on charity because they were never given the basic right of being able to earn an income of their own and be able to help themselves. Its great to say that the men of a family are supposed to protect, cherish and take care of their women, but realistically, how many men actually do that? 

Reply on April 17, 2022: Good observation. Yes, there are multiple problems being faced by many individuals and families. We need to remember that this world is a place of trial and enmity. The Quran doesn’t say we won’t have problems, but it advises us how to handle the challenges. There is detailed guidance on social issues. 

For example, Surah an-Nisa (The Women) guides men in the matter of becoming guardians of orphans, even allowing marriages with their widowed mothers, if necessary (read Q4:3 & Q4:127 together). 

——— 

UY wrote on April 14, 2022: There’s no supporting evidence in the Quran, or in the article, that women shouldn’t work or should stay at home. It only says that they aren’t liable to pay the bills and can use their funds at their discretion 

Reply on April 17, 2022: 

1) owning wealth, and working to earn are two different things 

2) working to earn becomes a necessity for some; that’s different from the Feminist movement which rebels to break all shackles, and intends to redefine the roles and responsibilities 

——— 

YS wrote on April 14, 2022: Hazrat Khadija was a successful business woman 

Reply on April 17, 2022: She lived in polytheistic Makkah, and she was the first woman to embrace Islam. Later on, in the Muslim State of Medina, we read in Q33:28 onwards the guidance for the Prophet’s wives. Q33:33-34 tells them to: 

33

وَقَرْنَ فِي بُيُوتِكُنَّ وَلَا تَبَرَّجْنَ تَبَرُّجَ الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ الْأُولَىٰ ۖ وَأَقِمْنَ الصَّلَاةَ وَآتِينَ الزَّكَاةَ وَأَطِعْنَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ ۚ إِنَّمَا يُرِيدُ اللَّهُ لِيُذْهِبَ عَنكُمُ الرِّجْسَ أَهْلَ الْبَيْتِ وَيُطَهِّرَكُمْ تَطْهِيرًا

And abide in your houses and do not display yourselves as [was] the display of the former times of ignorance. And establish prayer and give zakah and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah intends only to remove from you the impurity [of sin], O people of the [Prophet's] household, and to purify you with [extensive] purification.

34

وَاذْكُرْنَ مَا يُتْلَىٰ فِي بُيُوتِكُنَّ مِنْ آيَاتِ اللَّهِ وَالْحِكْمَةِ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ لَطِيفًا خَبِيرًا

And remember what is recited in your houses of the verses of Allah and wisdom. Indeed, Allah is ever Subtle and Acquainted [with all things]

https://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display.php?chapter=33&translator=29&show_arabic=1
 

——— 

MY wrote on April 14, 2022: Your blog is proof that some women aren't fulfilled as just homemakers, they want to be doing something else too :p

Reply on April 17, 2022: Alhamdolillah, passively sharing online the insights Allah has blessed me with. 

——— 




Last updated on: April 17, 2022